Say what you will about that speech before the U.N. Security Council in the run-up to the Mess in Mesopotamia. I find Colin Powell to be a good person in an era of evil people. And it's not just because his hobby is an one-time obsession of mine -- restoring old Volvos.If Powell weren't such a genuine American hero as Vietnam veteran and commander of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, all the while being a trailblazing black, it would be easy to dismiss his years as secretary of state. This most notably includes the way The Decider played him for a patsy and then marginalized him when he alone among White House insiders questioned why the hell the U.S. was invading Iraq in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.
Now comes "Soldier: The Life of Colin Powell," a generally sympathetic bio by Karen DeYoung, a Washington Post scribe, that lays bare the central contradiction in his life:
As Powell walked into the U.N. that day, he understood he was being used to persuade not foreign governments but the American people that invading Iraq and taking out Saddam Hussein was a noble cause based on evidence that he knew to be flimsy.The answer, I believe, is all of the above.
Was Powell unwilling to sacrifice his career for his country?
Was he taking a bullet for his boss?
Was he stretching the time-honored military concept of loyalty to the breaking point?
More here.
2 comments:
My Lai?
You raise a good point, but Powell's role is a bit fuzzy.
Powell was an Americal Division major and in the command structure when the My Lai massacre was first brought to the attention of his superiors. He was asked to look into the initial allegation and concluded the the soldier making the allegation had been too far from the front to be credible.
The cover-up of the massacre was not exposed until later when a helicopter pilot pressed for an investigation and Seymour Hersh broke his Pulitzer Prise-winning New York Times story.
Post a Comment