Monday, October 29, 2018

Tribalism Run Amok: Trump Did Not Make America What It Is, America Made Trump

Americans always have had an unjustifiably lofty view of their society, which is why they are able to look down their upturned noses as Tutsis beat up on Hutus in Rwanda, Serbs beat up on Croats in the Balkans, Shiites beat up on Sunnis in Iraq and Buddhists beat up on Muslims in Myanmar, to name just a few of the blood-soaked conflicts in recent history.  Americans believe they're beyond such tribalism, and indeed the Founding Fathers were determined to build a democracy where the individual was more important than the tribe.  That failed spectacularly in a little dustup called the Civil War, and the big message underlying the election of Donald Trump is that it is still failing.  
The message within that message as we slouch toward the most important election since the last most important election is that Trump did not make America what it is.  To the contrary, America made Trump president because of what it has become. 
The most recent manifestations of that are the sick exploits of mail-bomb suspect Cesar Sayoc and the orgy of violence involving other monsters who are listening when Trump gives them permission to terrorize by advocating violence, including body slamming journalists, playing footsie with neo-Nazis and dog whistling anti-Jewish messages while shamelessly admiring one world leader above all others -- the man who after all is responsible for his improbable presidency and the nightmare it has visited on us as our core values are methodically undermined and destroyed.  
Speaking of Vladimir Putin, there is no better example of tribalism prevailing over patriotism than the Russia scandal.   
Russia helped throw the 2016 election to Trump.  His campaign colluded in that effort. Despite Trump's repeated efforts to obstruct justice, career Republican lawman Robert Mueller was tasked with trying to sort things out.  But tribalism has not spared the special prosecutor nor the FBI.  Mueller is suspect in the eyes of the Republican tribalists -- I call them Vichy Republicans -- who have rushed to abrogate their constitution duty while subscribing to the dystopian fiction that FBI has hatched a deep-state plot to undermine the president, never mind what Moscow and the president have done to undermine democracy.  Beware the exploding Republican heads if he recommends that Congress impeach Trump.
Those red state-blue state maps that are popping up everywhere as the midterms approach are not merely graphic representations of the American body politic of recent years.  They vividly and shockingly illustrate the parlous condition of our 240-year-old democracy.  
A tribe of white voters predominate in red states in the exurban and rural interior.  They are for the most part nationalist in outlook, deeply religious and dominate the Republican Party. 
A tribe of racial minorities predominate in blue states on the coasts.  They are for the most part are urbanized, global in outlook, less religious and dominate the Democratic Party.   
"Tribalism only destabilizes a democracy when it calcifies into something bigger and more intense than our smaller, multiple loyalties; when it rivals our attachment to the nation as a whole; and when it turns rival tribes into enemies," writes the inimitable Andrew Sullivan, a pioneering blogger and onetime Republican conservative who has that rare capacity to change his mind when confronted with . . . uh, the facts.   
"And the most significant fact about American tribalism today," Sullivan continues, "is that all three of these characteristics now apply to our political parties, corrupting and even threatening our system of government." 
It is convenient but inaccurate to suggest that tribalism evaporated after the Civil War and re-emerged only in the last several years as politics became so overtly tribal and hence divisive.  In fact, tribalism never went away.   
Tribalism merely was subsumed by waves of immigrants who were assimilated into society in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and then the two world wars, which acted as huge unifiers.  In the case of World War II and the years following, blacks were integrated into the military, industry and society at large, and nearly 40 percent of black voters called themselves Republicans, the once proud party of Lincoln. 
But by 1964, tribalism was back with a vengeance. 
Barry Goldwater's presidential campaign drove most blacks away from the GOP and that re-racialization continued apace in the early 1970s with Richard Nixon's so-called Southern Strategy in response to the civil rights movement, Ronald Reagan's unflattering characterizations of poor blacks in the 1980s, and Republican Governor Pete Wilson's unapologetic loathing of the Latino immigrants pouring into California in the 1990s. 
By the time the first red-blue maps appeared in the 2000 presidential race, abortion and gay rights had further split the two parties.   
Behind the national electoral draw that year between Al Gore and George Bush were the two tribes so recognizable today, and the Supreme Court ruling handing the presidency to Bush ended -- probably forever -- the Founders' intention that the high court be nonpartisan, which is to say nontribal.  Then came 2008 and an even deeper tribal fracturing over race with the election of Barack Obama, the first African-American president. 
As Sullivan notes, there were other polarizers, as well, including the arrival of Fox News and the Internet and social media, right-wing extremism ascendent, partisan gerrymandering and the end of cross-tribal compromise in Congress.   
While no one was looking, there also was a decline of Christianity as a common denominator for the political parties, an intellectual sorting-out in which non-college educated whites increasingly resented the college educated because they got the better paying jobs, and a conservative backlash against universities as bastions of liberalism. 
And on top of all that, Democrats and Republicans don't merely disagree with their opponents' political views these days. 
They disagree -- angrily and sometimes in violent terms -- over their opponents' very values, each side claiming to be more loyal to mother, god and country than the other as emotion reliably supplants reason.  Can you say Brett Kavanaugh? 
This helps explain why there will never be effective gun control despite Sandy Hook, Las Vegas and Marjorie Stoneman Douglas, and why the big takeaway from the superb Burns-Novick History of the Vietnam War series is that succeeding generations of national leaders since that bloody interregnum learned nothing from it. 
With the three core components of tribalism -- race, religion and geography -- defining the political parties, 2016 was bound to be a watershed election. 
But little did we suspect that a profoundly unqualified narcissist, career crook, pathological liar and misogynist wearing a red Make America Great Again baseball cap who made vague promises to shake up Washington would face off against an eminently qualified, if flawed, woman who proudly wore a lifetime of public service on her sleeve and promised to build on the Obama legacy while bearing the scars of 30 years of virulent right-wing attacks.
Trump, of course, lost the popular vote but eked out an Electoral College victory over Hillary Clinton.  While the pernicious consequences of the Russian effort to sabotage the Clinton campaign cannot be underestimated, Trump built his backdoor victory on opportunism more than tribalism.  His claim that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose the support of his followers lays bare their deep-rooted animosity  -- a toxic brew of fear and hate -- toward anyone who is not like them, as well as an addiction to the rhetorical extremism that is Trump's stock in trade.   
Is it too late to turn back?  Possibly. 
Americans have assumed that their democracy was on autopilot.  That the worst excesses would sort themselves out as the political pendulum swung back and forth.  That constitutional checks and balances would assure that the pendulum would return to center.  That our capacity for moderation, compassion and forgiveness ran deeper than our baser instincts.  That we would stop talking past each other and talk to each other.   
But none of that took into account that beyond halcyon skies, amber waves of grain and purple mountain majesties above those enameled plains, we were members of tribes first and Americans second.   
It's in our DNA, and that makes finding a way out of our national nightmare exceedingly difficult because it would require closing the gap between those tribes, as well as changing or at least diluting the mutations of the political parties.   
I do not see that happening, certainly not in my lifetime, but I certainly will vote next Tuesday.  


scripto said...

Thanks for bumming me out. I was hoping things would get better.

NiB said...

The tribes that truly matter are the so-called "ten lost." One who has taken the time to search it out understands that America is the True Israel. They were never lost. Only displaced.

"Ere long all the world shall become and remain One Nation under God,with Liberty and Justice for ALL.

You'll see.

HCC said...

Does this mean I hafta remove my war paint or just hide my feathers? It’s clearly too soon for a peace pipe.

Bscharlott said...

A little too pessimistic for me. As your generation and mine, the Baby Boomers, die off, maybe the gen-Xers, millennials and so forth will will make for a less toxic brew of politics. The revanchist Republican white geezers are in their death throes now, I suspect -- or maybe 2020 will be their last shot. But demography is destiny. Change is a-coming.

Dan Leo said...

Good essay, Shaun.