Friday, March 26, 2010

The Pedophile Priest Scandal & Parlous State Of The Roman Catholic Hierarchy

APOLOGIES ARE NOT ENOUGH
The latest developments in the never ending Roman Catholic pedophile priest saga are deeply depressing.

Cardinal Séan Brady, who as head of the Catholic Church in Ireland engineered an enormous cover-up of the epidemic of abuse of boys and girls, is nevertheless applauded at St. Patrick's Day Mass, while Pope Benedict XVI did not defrock a priest who molested more than 200 deaf boys and appears to have known far more about the groping, fellating and sodomizing of youngsters by the priests in his charge when he was archbishop of Munich than he has let on.

Beyond the seemingly bottomless pit of revelations is the fact that while Brady and the Holy Father have apologized, in the cardinal's case in part for once ordering two children to keep silent after they were sexually assaulted by a priest, there is the growing sense that the hierarchy of a church with over a billion members worldwide that first denied the scandal, then blamed the victims, then complained when diocese after diocese was bankrupted when courts ordered the victims to be compensated, is incapable of punishing their own if they wear miters.

That is to say that out of 5,000 cardinals and bishops worldwide -- and the scandal is pretty much worldwide -- only Cardinal Bernard Law of Boston, Bishop John Magee of Ireland and two or three other bishops have resigned or been forced out.


* * * * *
My own back story does not predispose me to feel sympathy for these men. Or forgiveness were I a Catholic even as the church's reaction tp the scandal has moved from defending the undefensible to contrition by some people at the highest levels.

My father was raised a Catholic, was an altar boy and attended 12 years of parochial school with the mandatory assaults on his knuckles by nuns with rulers.

His big takeaway was that the church thrived on and controlled its congregants through the very guilt that the church has used as a cudgel to shame abuse victims. Back in the day, it also was anti-Semitic.

This was borne out when my father wanted to marry my mother in his own mother's church but was turned down because the father of his love was a goddamned Jew. Jane and Joe had to settle for a simple ceremony in an assistant priest's rectory office
that was drowned out by the Gene Autry cowboy records being played at a high volume by an elderly and nearly deaf priest next door.

* * * * *
Don't get me wrong. Benedict is a vast improvement over John Paul II, whose orthodoxy did not allow him to appreciate the vileness of the pedophilia epidemic let alone act on it.

If progress is measured in terms of the number and sincerity of apologies, then Benedict would get a pass. If reform is measured in terms of developing stringent after-the-fact policies, then he also would get a pass.

But I -- and apparently a lot of Catholics, as well -- believe that not just abuser
priests but enabling bishops must also be punished, and Benedict has been unwilling or unable to say that what they did was not merely sinful but criminal, while he has refused to accept the resignations of some offending bishops.

He needs to finish the job. Sacking Cardinal Roger Michael Mahoney of Los Angeles, who paid out $660 million to 0ver 500 abuses victims but still gets his ring kissed, would be a good start.

And then personally acknowledging deep shame at his secret 2001 edict to
bishops instructing them to put the church's interests ahead of the safety of children.

PHOTOS (From top to bottom): Cardinal Brady, Cardinal Law, my parents, Gene Autry, Cardinal Mahoney.


4 Comments:

Anonymous Labrys said…

I understand you pain over the Catholic Church forbidding your father's marriage. My husband's stepfather is Catholic, and divorced from his first wife---the man sits, disconsolately in Mass and can't take communion.

I was a Catholic convert, attracted by the beauty of the Mass, by the sweet Marian side of the religion; but I left the Church in disgust shortly after John Paul began what I viewed as his medieval-bound odyssey. I do not think Ratzinger is an improvement.

Some of the recent defensive statements from the Vatican over what he knew or didn't about the sex scandal in Germany are enough to make even a well-intentioned former Catholic blanch in shame. To say that these "accusations" are intended for no purpose except to "bring down this Pope" is revelatory of a paranoia and disconnect from the members of the Church that is more extreme than I believed possible.

12:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said…

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

12:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said…

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

12:31 PM  
Anonymous John Freeland said…

Having been raised in a Catholic family, I must confess, I still don't get what they're all about. My kids were baptised in Protestant churches. Good churches.

Celebacy for priests was intended to free them from split loyalties. Having no wives or children to support, they were free to always stand up for God's moral cause.


What are all these priests doing today? Are they standing up and demanding the social justice Jesus intended? Are they afflicting the comfortable? Are they advocating for the poor? Are they challenging the economic status quo?

We had them during the Vietnam war. I can't think of a single priest out making a fuss for a good cause.

10:25 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home