So here’s my raw take:
* Yes, depicting the prophet is a blasphemy prohibited under Muslim law (Sharia) and the cartoon itself was unflattering because Muhammad's turban was drawn in the shape of a bomb. But that doesn’t mean that Sharia should be followed outside the Muslim world any more than Palestinians should be required to eat fish on Fridays because devout Roman Catholics in Denmark do. So, Muslims have a right to be offended, but Danes have a right to an unfettered press.
* Few things make me angrier than when Muslims or other rabid sectarians try to impose their religious values on me. That is exactly what the Christian Republican right wing is trying to do in the U.S.
* It is discouraging that Denmark, Norway and some other governments are now falling all over themselves to apologize for a cartoon that was published in September.
* The Western media does a pretty good job of stereotyping the Muslim world, but it is Muslims themselves who are the ace stereotypers, both in how they wish to be viewed and how they view the West.
* Am I to assume that the cartoon protesters have nothing better to take to the streets over? Is the godawful leadership of the so-called pillars of the Muslim world like
* Mubarak's response -- warning that the failure of European governments to deal with the cartoon issue would give terrorists further pretext to maim and kill -- is notably vile.
* How the hell can these people afford to protest all the time? Do they call in sick? Do their benefits packages include time off for demonizing?
No comments:
Post a Comment