Friday, April 15, 2016

Politix Update: Donald's Tent Party Runs Into Obstacles; Why We Mistrust Hillary

This should have been a good week for the man with the small hands and peculiar hair.  He continues to lead in the polls for the three big remaining Republican primary states — New York, Pennsylvania and California.  Paul Ryan, who could have imperiled his path to the nomination, declared that he wouldn’t run.  His campaign manager got off on charges he roughed up a reporter. And career right-wing kook and marital rape advocate Phyllis Schlafly stood firm in her endorsement of him. 
But Donald Trump is grouchy because he is used to always getting his way, but arcane Republican primary, caucus and delegate selection rules are slowing his march toward the Cleveland convention and his dream of the White House and his own version of the Republican big tent — internment camps for immigrants and other undesirables. 
Trump's problem is that he hasn't been paying attention while preening for the masses and ripping off with snappy one-liners, which has allowed Ted Cruz, who is paying very close attention to the grassroots, to rack up delegates in states like Colorado that were Trump's for the taking were his staff and supporters there more concerned about staying on top of the process than beating their chests.  (Heck, even two of Trumps kids aren’t registered to vote in the New York primary.) 
And that while exploiting corporate rules has been a piece of cake for him compared to exploiting the rules of a party he has repeatedly disparaged even if the GOP's rules do, by gosh, tend to favor the front-runner.  Which he unmistakably remains and is likely to remain when he wins most if not all of New York's 95 delegates next Tuesday.   
I still harbor the suspicion, as articulated here a couple of weeks ago, that Trump is preparing to be a sore loser and inch out of the race -- somehow -- because his history shows he would be unable to cope with his certain loss in November, and his disorganization at ground level in places like Colorado, which he technically won while ceding its delegates to Lyin' Ted, indicates he would have a hard time winning the nomination if it extends beyond the first ballot.   
And doncha know, if the process was truly rigged, Jeb Bush would have a lock on the nomination and Trump really would have something to be grouchy about. 
Hillary Clinton's negatives are mind boggling and nearly as bad as Donald Trump's.  Which makes my head want to explode because, while not exactly the personifications of good and evil, Clinton has more integrity and experience in her pinkie finger than Trump has from stem to stern.  And she is a progressive, while Bernie Sanders is a fantasist, as the Democratic debate last night again showed.  And Trump, of course, a fascist. 
My view has been that Clinton's negatives are driven by the relative success of what she calls the "vast right-wing conspiracy," which has been slinging mud at her ever since she came to Washington nearly a quarter century ago, and that there are a whole lot of people out there who, while not admitting it, don’t like her because she is a woman and is on the verge of becoming the first woman president. 
But it obviously goes deeper than these things.  My Facebook followers are a pretty damned savvy and engaged lot, so I asked them why so many people had negative views of Clinton.  A sampling of their responses:
"She’s too pragmatic.  Get things done now for the sake of getting things done now.  Better that she would stand for some principles even at the loss of some accomplishments.  Because of this she is seen as flip-flopping or being too clever for our own good." 
"She's a lying, corporatist war hawk who is backed by Wall Street and the energy lobby." 
"I don't get real straight answers about why people don't like her. They hate her and can't back it up and won't read about her. Total shutdown. I guess it's just because of hearing a few bad things about her. Non-political friends keep saying she's a liar, but can't tell me what she lied about. Or, they are the real Hillary haters who will give you ten thousand reasons why they hate her and all of them could be dispelled easily with a little research. I have given up trying to figure it out."  
"She says she’s against fracking unless it is heavily regulated, but was very active as secretary of state in pushing fracking in countries like Bulgaria that have few or no environmental regulations that would have protected the people."  
"Arkansas et. seq."  
"Could be because she is a liar responsible for the death of innocent Americans."  
"Her ties to fossil fuel and Wall Street lobbies." 
"She's a Republican by what she votes for and against whose money she takes!" 
"I think she's also paying the price for her husband's arrogance.  In the 80's, he delighted in strategizing rings around the Right.  He could have been the best, except he got reckless and couldn't keep his pants on.  . . . A lot of that animus transferred to her."  
"She's a wonderful bureaucrat but I', going to have  hard time voting for her as she is so in bed with the establishment and I'm ready for a revolution." 
"Add an army of over-the-top zealots for Sanders. incensed by rhetoric from the Right and Left.  Angry rhetoric doesn't have to make sense."
"I think she's Nixon in drag, but compared to the current crop of GOP candidates, that makes her the only Republican moderate.  I'm voting for her if that's the only option."  
"The right-wing misogynists account for maybe half of the people who dislike her.  The rest of us are going on her record." 
My own problems with Clinton have been oft-stated: Her unsatisfactorily tepid response to her husband’s serial infidelities.  Being one of 374 people in Congress who drank the Bush kool aid on Iraq.  Providing bad advice to the president on overthrowing the Libyan regime, although she is unfairly blamed for the Benghazi attacks. And she has vacillated on environmental issues of concern to me.   
But none of these negatives should or will prevent her from becoming the nominee and the next president. 
POLITIX UPDATE IS WRITTEN BY SHAUN MULLEN, A VETERAN JOURNALIST AND BLOGGER FOR WHOM THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN IS HIS 12th SINCE 1968.  CLICK HERE FOR AN INDEX OF PREVIOUS COLUMNS. 
© 2015-2016 SHAUN D. MULLEN.

IMAGES FROM DONKEYHOTEY/FLICKR.  
USED WITH PERMISSION.

Thursday, April 14, 2016

An Appreciation: Miles Davis Didn't Play What's There, He Played What's Not There


MILES AHEAD, A NEW MOVIE STARRING DON CHEADLE AS MILES DAVIS, IS NOW IN THEATERS, SO WHAT BETTER TIME TO GROOVE ON THE MAN WITH THE HORN HIMSELF.
Writing about Miles Davis is daunting, if not downright intimidating. For one thing, the legendary trumpet player probably has been written about and analyzed more than any musician-composer this side of Beethoven. There is even an entire book on the recording of just one of his over 100 albums.
For another thing, a word like "legendary" does not begin to capture the enormous influence that Miles exerted on the genre, the many -- and I mean many -- young musicians he mentored who became stars in their own right, as well as his vast body of his work and extraordinary improvisational powers,  As Dan Morganstern put it, Miles gave nonconformity a good name. 
For yet another thing, while Miles was by no means the most technically proficient trumpet player he was in the forefront of virtually every major development in jazz for four decades and forged the link between jazz and a lot of other music I love – including funk, fusion and rock. People like me who live and breathe music owe him an enormous debt. 
I do not know whether Mr. Davis would forgive me for calling him by his first name. He definitely wouldn't appreciate that "owed a debt thing" because he was beholden to no one. Sometimes not even himself. 
But perhaps – just perhaps -- I have earned the privilege of referring to him as "Miles" through the thousands of hours that I have listened to his albums over 45 years, the articles and books that I have read about him, and the one time that I saw him live – a truly awful show in Philadelphia during one of the periodic snits when he would keep his back to the audience for an entire performance. 
THE FORMATIVE YEARS
Miles Dewey Davis III was born in 1926 into a relatively well-to-do family. His father was a dentist and his mother a decent blues pianist, something that she hid from her young son even as she and her husband encouraged him to learn to play a musical instrument. 
Miles' mother favored the piano but his father bought him a trumpet at age 13 because, he would later claim, he knew she hated the sound. 
His first teacher, local East St. Louis, Illinois trumpeter Elwood Buchanan, stressed the importance of playing without vibrato, and Miles quickly developed a clear tone that would be his signature sound. Years later, this prompted him to remark: 
"I prefer a round sound with no attitude in it, like a round voice with not too much tremolo and not too much Baseline bass. Just right in the middle. If I can’t get that sound I can’t play anything."
Among Miles' early influences were Clark Terry, a friend and fellow trumpeter. He would have dropped out of school and joined Tiny Bradshaw’s band had his mother not insisted that he finish his final year of high school.
In 1944, Miles caught his first big break when he filled in as third trumpet for Buddy Anderson in the trailblazing Billy Eckstine big band behind Dizzy Gillespie and Charlie Parker.
Later that year, he moved to New York City, ostensibly to study under scholarship at the Juilliard School of Music, but he instead sought out Parker. His first recordings were made in 1945 with blues singer Rubberleggs Williams and tenor saxophonist Herbie Fields. He became a member of Parker's unofficial quintet, appearing on many of Parker's seminal bebop recordings for the Savoy and Dial labels. 
OUT ON HIS OWN
Miles' style on trumpet had become distinctive by 1948 and he began to blossom at the relatively tender age of 22 as a solo artist and in a nonet featuring Gerry Mulligan and Lee Konitz. He also developed a serious heroin habit that would tarnish his reputation and dog him for years. 
The group released seven singles on Capitol over the next two years, some featuring arrangements by arranger-composer-band leader Gil Evans, with whom he would have a long collaboration. 
Between 1950 and 1955, Miles mainly recorded as a leader for Prestige and Blue Note in a variety of small group settings with sidemen including Sonny Rollins, John Lewis, Kenny Clarke, Jackie McLean, Art Blakey, Horace Silver, Thelonious Monk, Milt Jackson and Charles Mingus. Whew! 
With the encouragement of boxing champion Sugar Ray Robinson, he returned to his parents' home over the winter of 1953-1954 and locked himself in a guest room for 12 days until the drug was fully out of his system. 
In 1954, Miles recorded a series of important recordings for Prestige that were released as Bags' Groove, Miles Davis and the Modern Jazz Giants and Walkin', as well as later titles.
He started using a Harmon mute to darken and subdue the timbre of his trumpet, and seldom played without it for the rest of his career. 
In July 1955, Miles played a legendary solo on Thelonious Monk's Round Midnight at the Newport Jazz Festival, a performance that thrust him back into the spotlight. This led record producer George Avakian to sign him to Columbia and the formation of the first incarnation of his great quintet. 
This band featured John Coltrane on tenor saxophone, Red Garland on piano, Paul Chambers on double bass and Philly Joe Jones on drums. It turned bebop convention on its ear through melodic lines like those heard on the quintet's own Round Midnight album (1955-56) and in turn led him to his early explorations of modal jazz. 
Heroin reentered the picture and the quintet disbanded in early 1957, then reformed and recorded Milestones (a precursor to the classic Kind of Blue) as a sextet in 1958 with the addition of Cannonball Adderley on alto sax. 
In the late 1950s and early 1960s, Miles recorded a series of albums with Evans, often playing flugelhorn as well as trumpet. These included Miles Ahead (1957), which used innovative editing to join the tracks together, turning each side of the album into seamless pieces of music.
In 1958, Miles and Evans recorded one of Davis' own and my favorites, Porgy and Bess, a loving rearrangement of pieces from the great George Gershwin opera of the same name. 
Sketches of Spain (1960) and Miles at Carnegie Hall (1961), which was recorded with a full orchestra under Evans' direction, followed. 
"KIND OF BLUE" AND BEYOND
In March and April of 1959, Miles reentered the studio with his sextet and the important addition of pianist Bill Evans to record Kind of Blue, one of the most influential jazz recordings ever and today that rarest of creatures – a triple platinum jazz album. (The recording sessions and album are dissected with loving care by Eric Nisenson in Kind of Blue: Miles Davis and His Masterpiece). 
The entirety of Kind of Blue was composed as a series of modal sketches around Evans' improvisational style. Each performer was given a set of scales sometimes written only hours earlier that defined the parameters of their improvisations, and recall Miles' famous quip: 
"Don't play what's there, play what's not there." 
The result was Miles' magnum opus and one of my favorite jazz albums. 
There is not an off note on Kind of Blue, which in its original vinyl incarnation included on Side One "So What," "Freddie Freeloader" and "Blue In Green," and on Side Two "All Blues" and "Flamenco Sketches." 
In 1963, Miles put together a new group that included tenor saxophonist George Coleman, bassist Ron Carter, drummer Tony Williams and pianist Herbie Hancock. They recorded Seven Steps to Heaven and In Europe that year and My Funny Valentine and Four and More in February 1964. All featured a repertoire of bebop and standards with the up-tempo numbers delivered at breakneck speed as Miles continued to expand his palette as a dizzying succession of fine young musicians pushed him to new heights. 
Later in 1964, Miles convinced saxophonist Wayne Shorter to quit Art Blakey's Jazz Messengers and become the quintet's principal composer. By the time of E.S.P. (1965), Miles' lineup consisted of Shorter, Hancock, Carter and Williams and is known as "the second great quintet." 
Miles turned 40 and there followed a series of powerful and largely modal-based albums with a playing style dubbed "freebop" that included some fusion and rock themes – as well as the tentative introduction of electric bass, piano and guitar. These included Miles Smiles (1966), Sorcerer (1967), Nefertiti (1967), Miles in the Sky (1968) and another of my favorites, Filles de Kilimanjaro (1968). 
This group, with occasional substitutions, began playing live concerts in continuous sets with each tune flowing into the next and only the melody indicating any sort of demarcation; Miles' bands would continue to perform in this way -- including the forgettable night that I saw him -- until his first retirement in 1975.
ELECTRIC MILES
By 1969, Miles was fully into the electric mode and his music influenced by acid rock and funk artists including Jimi Hendrix and Sly and the Family Stone. 
When In a Silent Way was recorded in February 1969, Miles had augmented his quintet with keyboard players Joe Zawinul and Chick Corea, guitarist John McLaughlin, and drummer-percussionists Jack DeJohnette and Airto Moreira. 
I was living in jazz crazy Tokyo when Bitches Brew was released in 1970. Not unlike people recalling where they were when a great historic event occurred, I vividly remember the day I took the subway to Sony's megastore in the Ginza and returned home with the luxuriantly thick vinyl album with the two disks cosseted in quality glassine sleeves. (U.S. pressings and sleeves were thin and cheap by comparison.)
I had not heard enough of Filles de Kilimanjaro and In a Silent Way, two important precursor albums, to be prepared for Bitches Brew, which some critics do not even consider to be jazz.
  
That argument is for purists, which I am not, but the album's debt to rock is unmistakable and was shocking on first listen and some time thereafter before my head caught up to my ears (as sometimes happens to me) and I gave myself over to the groove.
In the end, Bitches Brew is something of a mess, albeit a brilliant one, and I still find myself wishing that compositions like "Pharaoh’s Dance" and "Miles Runs the Voodoo Down" had semblances of beginning and ends, not just cacophonous middles. 
In 1972, Davis entered his penultimate creative period after being introduced to the music of electronic music composer and innovator Karlheinz Stockhausen, the result being a series of compositions that critics referred to as "space music," and sometimes not in a complimentary way. 
THE 'SILENT YEARS' AND COMEBACK
By the mid-1970s, Miles' worsening health problems included a bad heart, blood and kidney problems, throat difficulties, a stomach ulcer and a bad hip -- all exacerbated by his cocktail of choice -- cocaine and painkillers, a dark time that the new movie Miles Ahead captures. He was showing up late for gigs and missing others and clearly was suffering from a spiritual malaise. 
After getting a long delayed ball-and-socket hip implant in December 1975, Miles considered new projects. But he was not to play the trumpet again until 1980 and the intervening years were marked by darkness and seclusion. 
When he emerged from his funk in 1980 and picked up the trumpet again it was because of a longtime friend, actress Cicely Tyson, who helped him overcome his addictions and helped renew his enthusiasm for music. (He married Tyson in 1981; they divorced in 1988.) 
Miles also needed money, and he embarked on a series of appearances to mixed and sometimes awful reviews while continuing to grapple with health problems. He toured and recorded intermittently for the next decade, often with Bill Evans and bass player Marcus Miller. 
Ian Carr writes in Miles Davis: The Definitive Biography that his comeback years:
 
"[W]ere like a gigantic, recurring lap of honor round the concert halls and festivals of the USA, Canada, Europe, Japan, and occasionally taking in the Middle East, South America and Australia, but they were also much more than that. He gradually eased himself into new ways of recording and music-making that were, yet again, unique to him." 
Tutu, recorded in 1986 as Miles was turning 60, is perhaps his most notable album of the era, which included an appearance on Saturday Night Live and a cameo as a street musician in Bill Murray's Scrooged. 
Miles died of a stroke, pneumonia and respiratory failure on September 28, 1991, at age 65. 
IN RETROSPECT
Miles delighted in confounding his critics and would rub their faces in his prideful blackness. 
He asserted in Miles: The Autobiography that his career was all about making music for young African-American audiences, a noble goal and one that it is difficult to say he didn't accomplish although it is probable that the vast majority of his listeners – live and on disk – have been white. No matter. 
Miles' autobiography is a bit of a tough slog because his feelings of racial injustice keep getting in the way of intriguing glimpses into the insatiable curiosity and black-hot fire that I believe were at the core of his genius. Again, no matter. 
Such feelings were certainly well within his rights because having a comfortable upbringing and an acclaimed and financially rewarding career in no way immunized him from the sting of racism. (In 1959, he was beaten to a pulp and arrested by New York City police while minding his own business during a break outside the famous Birdland nightclub, probably because he was hanging with a white woman.) 
The autobio dwells more on rewriting his history to suit his own purposes than his music. That also certainly was within his rights, but like great musicians in general, Mr. Miles Dewey Davis was at his best when blowing his horn and not when rapping about himself. 
So we'll let Jack DeJohnette have the second-to-last word: 
" . . . In the later years he got looser somehow and more generous with people, giving encouragement to younger musicians. And he was more communicative with his audience. . . . But I guess the best thing Miles taught us, not only in music but in life, was that we should learn to accept change, to embrace change rather than fear change.   
The last word belongs to Jean Bach, a jazz-loving friend and producer of the fine documentary, A Great Day in Harlem, who relates a phone conversation:.
"Miles!  Good to hear from you.  How're you doing?" 
Pause. 
"Oh, Jean, I'm a black man in a white man's world."   
Bach said she had to agree. 
"You white people find a way to take credit for everything.  You treated us terribly on the plantation, so we had to invent the blues.  Now you're taking credit for getting the blues invented!  Tell me, Jean, what's next?"

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

On Sam Cooke's Anthemic 'A Change Is Gonna Come.' Has It Come? Will It Come?

MARCH 7, 2015: THE FIRST AFRICAN-AMERICAN PRESIDENT COMMEMORATES THE 50th ANNIVERSARY OF BLOODY SUNDAY 
Sam Cooke's "A Change Is Gonna Come" is one of the greatest of American anthems.  Oft covered by other artists over the years, I heard the great soul man himself singing the unrivaled original 1964 version the other night on Marcus Miller's SiriusXM radio show.  The setting sun was pushing away the last of the clouds that had gifted us an unseasonably late snow, and I felt like I was hearing the song all over again for the first time.  It gave me goosebumps, and I got to wondering whether the change Cooke hoped was gonna come had indeed come although we live in an era where we seem incapable of change -- for the good.   
The opening lyrics to the song are among the deepest, most beautiful and memorable in the canon:      
I was born by the river
In a little tent
And just like the river
I’ve been running ever since
It is a matter of conjecture as to whether Cooke wrote the song specifically with the civil rights movement in mind, but I always have considered it a movement anthem because of the lyrics  
Then I go to my brother
And I say, "Brother, help me please,"
But he winds up knockin' me
Back down on my knees 
which call to mind "Bloody Sunday," in which police gassed and beat civil rights marchers as they crossed the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama on March 7, 1965.   
As it was, Cooke had recorded "A Change Is Gonna Come" as the B-side of "Shake," a modest hit that was released a few days after he was shot to death on December 11, 1964 in a Los Angeles motel.  He was 33.   
Cooke said he was moved to write the song after hearing Peter, Paul and Mary's cover of another Sixties anthem, Bob Dylan's "Blowin’ in the Wind," which certainly did address civil rights.  In any event, the songs could not be more different in several respects.  Ironically perhaps, Dylan evoked black spirituals in "Blowin’ in the Wind" while Cooke drew on Tin Pan Alley and "A Change Is Gonna Come" has been compared to "Old Man River" by Jerome Kern and Oscar Hammerstein.  And while Dylan's solo delivery was flat to the point of seeming apathy, Cooke's sweet delivery conveys a searching earnestness that is underpinned with lush strings.  
I believe the change Cooke hoped was gonna come has come, which prompted me to decide to run the photo atop this post and not one from Bloody Sunday itself, let alone Ferguson, Missouri, although there has not been enough change.  After all, police still are beating on and murdering unarmed black men, only today the Chicago Police Department was confirmed as a bastion of racism.  Bigotry thrives as Republicans try to gut the very Voting Rights Act that grew out of Selma, and the Black Lives Matter movement struggles for relevance. 
The entire lyrics: 
I was born by the river
In a little tent
And just like the river
I've been running ever since
It's been a long, long time coming
But I know a change gonna come
Oh, yes it will
It's been too hard living
But I'm afraid to die
I don't know what's up there beyond the sky
I go to the movie and I go downtown but
somebody keep telling me don't hang around
It's been a long, long time coming
But I know a change gonna come
Oh yes it will
Then I go to my brother
I say brother help me please
But he winds up knocking me
Back down on my knees
There's been times that I thought
I couldn't last for long
But now I think I'm able to carry on
It's been a long, long time coming
But I know a change is gonna come
Oh, yes it will

One pundit suggests that if Cooke were still alive, he might rename his anthem "The More Things Change."  That is a bit too cynical even for me, but it has the ring of truth -- as does the anthem itself.

CLICK HERE FOR A VIDEO OF COOKE SINGING "A CHANGE IS GONNA COME."

PHOTOGRAPH BY DOUG MILLS/THE NEW YORK TIMES 

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

God Bless You, Mr. Vonnegut


(PORTIONS ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED UPON MR. VONNEGUT'S DEATH -- APRIL 12, 2008)
The pang of sadness that I felt when I read that Kurt Vonnegut had left this mortal coil was a bit deeper than the mere fact that like a lot of folks of my generation I went head over heels over everything this counterculture idol wrote. 
I once worked in a rare book and manuscript library that includes the papers of Seymour Lawrence, Vonnegut's longtime literary agent and friend. I had been able to read first hand -- and share with visiting scholars -- the marvelous correspondence of these men as Vonnegut went from an unknown who was trying to get his first book published to a bestselling author and social critic who pondered the meaning of human existence with his distinctive pairing of humanist philosophy and trenchant wit, often through the science fiction genre. 
I was going through the Lawrence papers one day when I stumbled upon a brief typewritten note from Vonnegut in which he said that a trip to Germany for a Playboy magazine article on European architecture had prompted him to consider writing a novel about his traumatic experiences at the end of World War II. 
An advance scout, he was cut off from his battalion during the Battle of the Bulge and wandered alone behind enemy lines for several days until he was captured by German troops and sent to a prisoner of war camp in Dresden where he witnessed the infamous firebombing of that city.  That, of course, was the genesis of Slaughterhouse Five, his most famous novel, which was published in 1969 and became a must-read at the height of opposition to the Vietnam War.  (It was a pretty good movie, too.) 
In an article about his experience, Vonnegut wrote that: 
"The firebombing of Dresden was a work of art. . . . a tower of smoke and flame to commemorate the rage and heartbreak of so many who had had their lives warped or ruined by the indescribable greed and vanity and cruelty of Germany."
God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater, perhaps the most straightforward of Vonnegut's 14 books, has always been my favorite. 
This comic masterpiece is about the life and times of Eliot Rosewater, a World War II veteran with a bad case of what we now refer to as PTSD and volunteer fireman who heads the Rosewater Foundation, which lavishes his family's fortune on the misbegotten. 
Rosewater's philosophy, which of course mirrored Vonnegut's, is simple:

"Hello, babies. Welcome to Earth. It's hot in the summer and cold in the winter.  It's round and wet and crowded.  At the outside, babies, you’ve got about a hundred years here.  There’s only one rule that I know of, babies — 'God damn it, you’ve got to be kind.' " 
I read the book when it was published in 1965, and to this day am tempted to answer a telephone call as Rosewater always does: 
"Rosewater Foundation. How may we help you?" 
Looking back on life, Vonnegut once remarked: 
"Laughter and tears are both responses to frustration and exhaustion.  I myself prefer to laugh, since there is less cleaning up to do afterward." 
So it goes.

PHOTOGRAPH BY MR. VONNEGUT'S WIFE, JILL KREMENTZ

Monday, April 11, 2016

Politix Update: Dems Suppress The Vote, Too. And Why Paul Ryan Is No Unicorn.


"It's like being shot or poisoned," famously remarked Lindsey Graham of the choice between Donald Trump and Ted Cruz.  "What does it really matter?"  
It matters a whole heap to the Republican Party — or rather what's left of it — because both men are likely to be destroyed by Hillary Clinton in November, as well as the Dems taking back the Senate because of the likelihood of Clinton’s long coattails.  Under some head-to-head models, Bernie Sanders would do even better than Clinton because of her perceived negatives, but Republican prospects are so poor that those negatives won't be a factor.   
As Frank Rich puts it in New York magazine, "Clinton could probably shoot someone in front of Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue and still win."    
And so Republican elites and their backers like the Koch brothers, profoundly dismayed that the shell game they have played with Republican voters for years has backfired badly, are looking for a unicorn who could sweep to victory at a contested convention, which the GOP confab in Cleveland is increasingly looking like it will be, and then stand a fighting chance on Election Day.    
But the notion of the moment that Paul Ryan — let alone Paul the Apostle or Paul Bunyan — can reunify the GOP is a bad joke.  The only thing the House speaker has going for him is a pretty face, with or without the beard.  And while he's ambitious, he's not stupid.  He knows that playing the unicorn in Cleveland would be a suicide mission.  (Besides which, he can always pick up the pieces and run in 2020, and judging from his penchant for trying to stay in the news while staying off the campaign trail, he's already positioning himself to do just that.)
"I think it is all fantasy island," John Feehery, a GOP strategist, told Talking Points Memo. "This idea we are going to be able to pluck someone like a Paul Ryan and run him as a presidential candidate is a pretty big reach. I just don't see it happening."  
Just the mere mention of Ryan seizing the nomination from Trump or Cruz has the right-wing media reaching for their pitchforks.  
Breibart News, which is even more in the bag for Trump than Fox News and CNN, says Ryan is soft on immigration and to make the point has been featuring interviews with the family members of victims of crimes committed by immigrants who were in the country illegally.  Breitbart also is making the strange and unconnected claim that "as a result of unbridled Muslim migration into the United States, more than 2,100 U.S. girls in Wisconsin — the state represented by Ryan — are at-risk of suffering the anti-Western practice Female Genital Mutilation."    
If nothing else, Trump has made the long suffering working stiff an effective campaign issue, while Clinton and Sanders have made income inequality major planks of their campaign.    
This makes Ryan an especially juicy target.  He was widely and justifiably savaged in 2012 as Mitt Romney's running mate for his fealty to Reverse Robin Hood economics.  This has been the lynchpin of Republican economic policy for decades, and Ayn Rand-hugging Ryan still passionately embraces its precepts: Reward the rich, screw everyone else, and shred the social safety net while you're at it.
§   
There is a predictability to presidential campaigns.  Yes, even this beyond crazy one.  There are primaries and caucuses, nominating conventions, the general election and then the inevitable hankie-wringing for the losers: What went wrong and can the party be reunited after the inevitable clashes of policy and ego?  One of the things that makes 2016 different is that both parties face serious reunification issues despite the likelihood that the Democrats will hold onto the White House.  
Mind you that the Republicans face a far greater reunification challenge. But the Democrats have been working up some pretty pungent problems of their own right under our noses as the Republicans circle the drain and Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders take a page from the GOP playbook to bash each other over who is more qualified to be president, and Clinton’s surrogates launch a campaign to demonize Sanders’ embrace of democratic socialism.    
You should not be surprised to know that the Democratic National Committee is going to do pretty much anything it can to grease the skids for the party’s preferred candidate, a tactic that disastrously backfired on Republicans when Donald Trump stole a march on the party establishment.   
As secrets go, the fact that Debbie Wasserman Schultz is in the tank for Clinton and is not an impartial DNC chair isn’t exactly earth shattering.  
When she briefly denied Sanders’ campaign access to its own important voter data back in December after it was found the campaign’s national data manager took advantage of a software glitch in the central DNC’s voter information database to mine Clinton data, she appropriately found herself on the receiving end of a firestorm of allegations that she had been making it more difficult for Sanders and Martin O’Malley to raise their profiles.  That included scheduling most of the few Democratic debates on Saturday evenings when most people were watching football or otherwise engaged.  
But the main Democratic mischief maker is the superdelegate, which is nothing less than an effort — again a la the Republicans — to suppress the vote, in this case make it easier for Clinton to secure the nomination.  
A little background here: Superdelegates were dreamed up in the early 1980s after George McGovern got his clock cleaned by Richard Nixon in 1972 and Jimmy Carter's devastating loss to Ronald Reagan in 1980, in order to help the party establishment prevent the nomination of insurgent candidates of whom it disapproved.    
Superdelegates are party bigs — 712 Democratic leaders, legislators, governors, and so on — who can vote for any candidate at the nominating convention, regardless of whether that candidate won the popular vote. These unpledged delegates are mostly in the hip pocket of the DNC and make up 30 percent of the 2,382 delegates whose votes are needed to win the nomination, and could thus make a big difference.  As things now stand, Clinton has 469 superdelegates and Sanders a mere 31. 
The superdelegate equation is especially outrageous this year because Sanders is nothing if not an insurgent, but he's still getting screwed.    
Meanwhile, Sanders supporters are bewildered -- and increasingly angry -- over why he keeps winning states but remains well behind Clinton in delegates.  The answer is that Sanders does well in states with caucuses, which tend to attract more dedicated supporters but tend to be in smaller states that yield far fewer delegates than larger primary states.    
You could argue that the process is working pretty well since Clinton has received more votes in primaries and caucuses than Sanders (about 9.2 million to 7 million) and should be leading in number of delegates.  That the rules were changed long before the game commenced, not in the middle of it.  And that Sanders' slim pickings from caucuses is not so much stacking the deck against him than the realities of geography.  But here again the superdelegate equation works against him and, long story short, it is unwieldy and undemocratic even if an argument can be made that party members should have more say than voters.  Democrats need to ditch it.
POLITIX UPDATE IS WRITTEN BY SHAUN MULLEN, A VETERAN JOURNALIST AND BLOGGER FOR WHOM THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN IS HIS 12th SINCE 1968.  CLICK HERE FOR AN INDEX OF PREVIOUS COLUMNS. 
© 2015-2016 SHAUN D. MULLEN.

IMAGE FROM DONKEYHOTEY/FLICKR.  
USED WITH PERMISSION.

Saturday, April 09, 2016

An Election Parable: It Used To Be About Kibble & Change, But Now . . .

 (ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED IN APRIL 2014, BUT JUST AS APROPOS NOW.)
Imagine the American public as a big mixed-breed dog.  (That was easy, wasn't it?)  This dog had been treated poorly by its master for years, if not outright abused.  Other dogs, especially purebreds, were pampered with steak and all kinds of treats.  They luxuriated in comfy dog beds from L.L. Bean, never got wet when it rained or snowed or were toweled off if they did, had their own spot in the back of the family SUV when they went on vacation to tony resorts, and went to the vets for regular checkups and prompt care should, heaven forbid, they get sick.  

The big mixed-breed dog was not so fortunate, and like the many others with less distinguished parentage, subsisted on scraps and sometimes measly handouts from the master and his advisers.  He never got treats, lived in a leaky doghouse and got wet when the weather was bad.  If he was lucky enough to go for a ride, it was in a cage on the roof of the family SUV and the destination was anything but glamorous, and he never went to the veterinarians, not even for checkups.  As a mixed breed, he just wasn't deserving enough.
But things began to change for the better a few years ago when the big mixed-breed dog got a new master.  The new master promised better times for all dogs.  "Kibble and change, kibble and change," the new master vowed.  "Kibble and change."   
The new master was pretty much true to his word, and his advisers pretty much did his bidding, at least the ones who did not have purebred dogs and were not beholden to the old master.   The big mixed-breed dog's diet got better and most of the holes in his doghouse were patched.  Best of all, he began going to the vets for regular checkups.  He got shots when he was supposed to, was treated for a bad tooth, and now took medicine for hairballs.  
Things were definitely looking up for he and other mixed breeds, but then things began to change for the worse.  
Some of new master's advisers refused to help patch up the rest of the holes in the big mixed-breed's doghouse and it began to leak badly again.  His diet wasn't so good anymore, and the advisers pretty much cut off all the treats.   Worst of all, they threatened to stop his visits to the vets because the purebred dogs objected.  That and the fact too many dogs, most of them chihuahua mixes, were coming across the border.
The big mixed-breed dog was puzzled about why the better times seemed to be ending.  It seemed like the purebreds actually had preferred it when things weren't better for all dogs.  He decided to try to find out why when he next encountered a certain know-it-all poodle at the dog park.   
"You just don't get it," this poodle replied one day as he lifted his leg and directed a steam of pee on one of the trees that dog park volunteers had planted to provide shade on hot summer days.  These trees weren't looking so good because the poodle and other purebreds kept peeing on them, and the big mixed-breed dog knew that there soon would be no shade at all.

"You just don't get it, but then you always were a gullible cur," the poodle declared in his obnoxiously whiny drawl in explaining why the purebreds were biting the hand that fed the mixed breeds.  "Come a little closer and I'll tell you why if you promise to not tell your pals."  
"It's because your master is a mutt, too." 

IMAGE FROM SHUTTERSTOCK