Tuesday, February 07, 2006

In Praise of Shaker Art

With the conspicuous exception of the Shakers, the term "American religious art" is something of an oxymoron. Yet despite the popularity of the Shaker "brand" year in and year out, we know precious little about how the Shakers approached their art, most famously the design of their beautifully austere furniture.

Adam Gopnik sheds some interesting light on the matter in a New Yorker article that is typically long but well worth reading. It held a number of surprises and revelations, at least for me -- despite everything I thought I knew about the Shakers.

Gopnik's intro:
Weary old faiths make art while hot young sects make only trouble. Insincerity, or at least familiarity, seems to be a precondition of a great religious art—the wheezing and worldly Renaissance Papacy produced the Sistine ceiling, while the young Apostolic Church left only a few scratched graffiti in the catacombs. In America, certainly, very little art has attached itself directly to our own dazzling variety of sects and cults, perhaps because true belief is too busy with eternity to worry about the décor. The great exception is the Shakers, who managed, throughout the hundred or so years of their flourishing, to make objects so magically austere that they continue to astonish our eyes and our sense of form long after the last Shakers stopped shaking. Everything that they touched is breathtaking in its beauty and simplicity. It is not a negative simplicity, either, a simplicity of gewgaws eliminated and ornament excised, which, like that of a distressed object found in a barn, appeals by accident to modern eyes trained already in the joys of minimalism. No, their objects show a knowing, creative, shaping simplicity, and to look at a single Shaker box is to see an attenuated asymmetry, a slender, bending eccentricity, which truly anticipates and rivals the bending organic sleekness of Brancusi’s “Bird in Flight” or the algorithmic logic of Bauhaus spoons and forks. Shaker objects don’t look simple; they look specifically Shaker.

No comments: