As if the Republican Party didn't have enough negative publicity-grabbing
problems with a man who is not serious about wanting to be president
leading an overcrowded field of people who really want to be president and a
president who is doing a pretty good job of being president, now
comes (well, pretty soon, anyway) the Bishop of Rome, Vicar of Jesus
Christ, Successor of the Prince of the Apostles, Supreme Pontiff of the
Universal Church, Primate of Italy, Archbishop and Metropolitan of the
Roman Province, Servant of the Servants of God, and Holy Father.
You
can call him Francis, but the GOP probably would rather he be calling long
distance than embarking on a whirlwind U.S. tour that will include a
September 24 address to a joint session of Congress, the first in
history by a pontiff.
The
visit, which is taking on the hype of a Beatles reunion tour, will be a
celebratory occasion for many people, but for Republicans it will be a
stark reminder that the man who is the closest thing on earth to God for
America's 69 million Catholics (and presumably the 33 percent of congressfolk who are Catholic, as well) is a
flaming social liberal who has forcefully staked out ideological
positions diametrically opposite
to that of the Republican Party at a time when its efforts to broaden
its base seem, well, less than holy, which is to say somewhere between
halfhearted and desultory.
While
the Republicans are pushing for spending cuts that would
disproportionately impact on the poor, Francis has called the excesses
of
capitalism the "dung of the devil." While Republicans believe that
human-caused global warming is either a hoax or a liberal plot against
big business, Francis has inveigled against its "devastating effects in
the great cataclysms we witness." While Republicans adamantly oppose
the new accord with Iran on its nuclear program, Francis believes that
the pact "may be a definitive step toward a more secure and fraternal
world." And while most Republicans oppose immigration reform, Francis
has frequently confronted the "racist and xenophobic attitudes" that
often face undocumented aliens and has said immigrant children "must be
welcomed and protected."
The
pope's visit is especially problematic for House Speaker John Boehner,
who is a poster boy for a party that self-righteously jams God (well,
that white Christian god, anyway) into just about everything it says and does. And if the GOP plays
its cards right, it will have engineered the latest government shutdown
about the time Francis alights on Capitol Hill.
Boehner, who
frequently invokes his working-class Catholic roots in Reading, Ohio,
where his father was a tavern owner, has invited popes to address
Congress for the last 20 years, but Francis is the first to accept.
It should be noted that Francis,
while speaking out forcefully on issues Republicans pray will magically
disappear for the duration of his Washington visit but will not, has made no changes
in church
doctrine. This includes opposition to two Democratic grails -- abortion
and same-sex marriage. And perhaps not surprisingly, the pope's
honeymoon with American Catholics is pretty much over. Although a
little more than seven in 10 still have a favorable image of Francis,
according to a new Gallup poll, that is a drop of 18 percentage
points from last year. The drop is even more marked among conservative
Catholics, just 45
percent of whom have a positive opinion of him.
Despite
the potential for conflict, Boehner says he is just thrilled at the
prospect
of he and his fellow congressfolk meeting and greeting the Holy Father,
as well as surely hopes that there won't be any intemperate outbursts
from his flock like Joe Wilson's "You lie!" rant during President
Obama's rollout of the Affordable Care Act in a speech to Congress in
2009.
"Well,
listen, there's one thing we know about this pope," Boehner says. "He's
not afraid to take on the status quo or not afraid to say what he
really thinks. And I can tell you this: I'm not about to get myself into
an argument with the pope. So I'm sure the pope will have things to say
that people will find interesting, and I'm looking forward to his
visit."
You don't
have to be the pope to know that the Republican Party is on the wrong
side of history an awful lot these days. Such is the case with a
surprise issue of the 2016 presidential race -- the federal minimum
wage.
Raising
the federal minimum wage from a paltry $7.25 an hour, let alone
doubling it as have New York, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. this
month for certain workers, would hurt business owners, argue
Republicans. The reality is just the opposite: Putting more money in
workers' pockets helps everyone, but for the GOP to acknowledge that
would undermine "trickle-down"
economics, that frayed conservative security blanket that the party has
been sucking on for years in claiming that rewarding the rich and
screwing the middle class and poor actually helps everyone.
Democrats
Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton advocate raising the minimum wage;
Sanders wants to double it. The Fair Shot campaign, as the effort to hike the minimum wage is often
called, is bound to give Republicans fits as it spreads, and deservedly
so. It couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of curmudgeons.
BEWARE OF REPUBLICANS BEARING GIFTS
The
U.S. isn't Greece, but there is a lesson in its ongoing financial
disaster: Leading Republicans believe in the very policies that have
gotten it in such trouble.
"On
one side, just about everyone in the GOP demands that we reduce
government spending, especially aid to lower-income families," writes economist and Nobel laureate Paul Krugman in the New York Times.
"On
the other side, leading Republicans like Representative Paul Ryan
incessantly attack the Federal Reserve for its efforts to boost the
economy, delivering solemn lectures on the evils of 'debasing the
dollar' when the main difference between the effects of austerity in
Canada
and in Greece was precisely that Canada could 'debase' its currency,
while Greece couldn't. Oh, and many Republicans hanker for a return to
the gold standard, which would effectively put us into a euro-like
straitjacket."
Got that, kiddies? Slashing spending a la Ryan while blocking any
offsetting monetary easing will bring the policies
behind the Greek collapse to the U.S.
I
would be remiss not to mention Donald Trump, as tiresome as he has
become, and there are two developments related to him of note, or
perhaps notoriety: Despite his slander of John McCain, he continues to
lead in most national polls (which I predicted), has actually extended
his lead in some polls, and is guaranteed a spot in at least the first
presidential tevee debate. And he is threatening to bolt the GOP and
run as a third-party candidate (which anyone with a pulse could have
predicted) if the Republican Party doesn't kiss his ring.
Party
bigs have pretty much resigned themselves to Trump's bomb throwing,
which is drowning out the messages of the other candidates in the
overcrowded field, and provoking him would clearly backfire at this
stage of the game. That
is why a proposal floated at a Republican Governors Association meeting
to force Trump out of the forthcoming debates was DOA.
Under
the proposal, the three leading candidates not named Trump -- Jeb Bush,
Scott Walker and Marco Rubio -- would refuse to participate in the
debates if Trump was included because of his threat to bolt the party.
The other candidates would then get on board, or so the wishful thinking
went, and the television networks would be forced to show Trump the
door.
I
suppose there is a third development, as well: It is now widely
acknowledged that Trump's ascendancy is a direct result of the toxicity
of the Republican brand, an inescapable reality that I first wrote about
in May:
"In
the
last two-plus decades as the Republican Party's drift to the right
morphed into a full-blown gallop and the party's base came to be
dominated by
Bible thumpers and angry white men -- and frequently Bible thumping
angry white men -- the GOP has won only two of six presidential
elections, one because the Supreme Court gave the
Constitution the finger and the other because Republicans had perfected
their fear
machine message and the Democratic candidate was weak. It is
probable that Republicans will not halt their losing streak in 2016."
Probable is quickly morphing into likely, and that is not the fault of Trump, who is leading in many polls precisely because he
is an unserious man who has no desire to become president. Put another
way: Trump is a symptom of the rot in the Grand Old Party, not a cause.
Politix Update
is an irregular compendium written by veteran journalist Shaun Mullen,
for whom the 2016 presidential campaign is his (gasp!) 12th since 1968.
Click here for an index of previous Politix Updates.
No comments:
Post a Comment