Or was it?The big news out of the release is that the
But while their wealth may diminish Mrs. Clinton’s credibility as someone who claims to understand the problems of Main Street America, it is no reason to vote against her, especially since the vast majority of those millions were from the former president's book royalties, speaking fees and business deals.
Besides which, the Clintons paid nearly $34 million in federal taxes, and the fact that they paid so much rather than try to skate as so many other wealthy folks do should be a credibility enhancer.
They also gave $10 million to charity, including $3 million last year, a very generous amount by any standard.
As it is, the tax returns are portrait of how a president saddled with legal bills stemming from the Monica Lewinsky scandal and other investigations struck it rich by parlaying his successes and failures into best selling books and lucrative speaking tours, as well as business arrangements with fat cats who in turn have contributed generously to his wife's campaigns.
So wealthy have the Clintons become that Hillary Clinton could lend her campaign $5 million earlier this year and in all likelihood may have to borrow more as Barack Obama continues to raise substantially more money.
Beside the books and speeches, Bill Clinton's biggest single business income is from his partnership with Yucaipa Global Opportunities Fund, a Los Angeles-based investment firm founded by longtime
President Clinton also has been an adviser to InfoUSA, a data company whose chief executive, Vinod Gupta, has been a major donor to Democrats and gave at least $1 million to Bill Clinton's presidential library in
So is this critic satisfied?
At first glance yes, but still puzzled about why the Clintons allowed this to become such a big deal.More here and here.
They didn't want to take a chance earlier because of the Delaware vote. They know how prejudiced you people are against the wealthy.
ReplyDelete