tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19217611.post7706072318210629771..comments2024-03-28T09:13:04.373-04:00Comments on KIKO'S HOUSE: Barr Slavishly Defends Trump As He Parses A Highly Damaging Mueller ReportShaun Mullenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14964214385216513188noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19217611.post-73261821034541108502019-04-20T11:44:21.536-04:002019-04-20T11:44:21.536-04:00Don’t Barr’s actions also constitute obstruction?Don’t Barr’s actions also constitute obstruction?Racer Xhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02812393490896656818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19217611.post-11059009102255323292019-04-18T23:38:52.002-04:002019-04-18T23:38:52.002-04:00And from the report itself;
“If we had confidence...And from the report itself;<br /><br />“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state,” Mr. Mueller’s investigators wrote. “Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment.”Dan Leohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01603402268945559679noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19217611.post-39834155869709473612019-04-18T23:37:12.016-04:002019-04-18T23:37:12.016-04:00From the current New York Times front page, a much...From the current New York Times front page, a much different reading from Mr. Barr's:<br /><br />"Mr. Mueller, the special counsel, laid out how his team of prosecutors wrestled with whether Mr. Trump’s actions added up to a criminal obstruction-of-justice offense. They ultimately chose not to charge Mr. Trump, citing numerous legal and factual constraints, but pointedly declined to exonerate him and suggested that it might be the role of Congress to settle the matter."<br /><br />https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/us/politics/mueller-report-russian-interference-donald-trump.html<br />Dan Leohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01603402268945559679noreply@blogger.com